Skip to content

Restaurant, Chinese, fried rice, without meatvsRutabaga

Restaurant, Chinese, fried rice, without meat leads in Protein (4 vs 1) and Sugar (1 vs 6) and 1 more, while Rutabaga leads in Sodium (3 vs 356) and Calcium (44 vs 12) and 1 more.

Macronutrients (per 100g)

174
Calories
N/A
4
Protein
1
3
Total Fat
N/A
33
Carbohydrates
N/A
N/A
Dietary Fiber
3
1
Sugar
6
N/A
Cholesterol
N/A

Vitamins & Minerals (per 100g)

356
Sodium
3
12
Calcium
44
0
Iron
0
64
Potassium
265
N/A
Vitamin C
N/A

Similar Comparisons to Restaurant, Chinese, fried rice, without meat vs Rutabaga

More comparisons with Restaurant, Chinese, fried rice, without meat

vs Almond butter, creamyvs Almond milk, unsweetened, plainvs Anchovies, canned in olive oilvs Apple juicevs Apples, fujivs Apples, galavs Apples, granny smithvs Apples, honeycrisp

More comparisons with Rutabaga

vs Almond butter, creamyvs Almond milk, unsweetened, plainvs Anchovies, canned in olive oilvs Apple juicevs Apples, fujivs Apples, galavs Apples, granny smithvs Apples, honeycrisp
Data sourced from USDA FoodData Central (CC0 1.0 Universal (public domain)).