CollardsvsRestaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork
Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork leads in Protein (9 vs 3) and Iron (2 vs 1), while Collards leads in Dietary Fiber (4 vs 1) and Sodium (8 vs 293) and 3 more.
Macronutrients (per 100g)
N/A
Calories
260
3
Protein
9
1
Total Fat
15
7
Carbohydrates
26
4
Dietary Fiber
1
N/A
Sugar
10
N/A
Cholesterol
22
Vitamins & Minerals (per 100g)
8
Sodium
293
293
Calcium
45
1
Iron
2
401
Potassium
151
87
Vitamin C
2
Similar Comparisons to Collards vs Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork
More comparisons with Collards
More comparisons with Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork
Data sourced from USDA FoodData Central (CC0 1.0 Universal (public domain)).