Ford Ranger 2WDvsMazda CX-70 SC 4WD
Mazda CX-70 SC 4WD leads in City MPG (25 vs 21) and Highway MPG (28 vs 25) and 2 more, while Ford Ranger 2WD leads in Annual Fuel Cost (2,600 vs 2,650).
Fuel Economy
21
City MPG
25
25
Highway MPG
28
23
Combined MPG
26
Engine & Drivetrain
4
Cylinders
4
2
Engine Displacement
3
RWD
Drive Type
4WD
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Regular Gasoline
Fuel Type
Premium Gasoline
Emissions & Cost
395
CO₂ Emissions
133
2,600
Annual Fuel Cost
2,650
Standard Pickup Trucks 2WD
Vehicle Class
Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD
Similar Comparisons to Ford Ranger 2WD vs Mazda CX-70 SC 4WD
More comparisons with Ford Ranger 2WD
More comparisons with Mazda CX-70 SC 4WD
Data sourced from EPA Fuel Economy Data (Public Domain (U.S. Government)).