Audi RS 3vsFord Ranger 2WD
Ford Ranger 2WD leads in City MPG (21 vs 20) and Annual Fuel Cost (2,600 vs 3,000), while Audi RS 3 leads in Highway MPG (29 vs 25) and CO₂ Emissions (387 vs 395).
Fuel Economy
20
City MPG
21
29
Highway MPG
25
23
Combined MPG
23
Engine & Drivetrain
5
Cylinders
4
3
Engine Displacement
2
AWD
Drive Type
RWD
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Premium Gasoline
Fuel Type
Regular Gasoline
Emissions & Cost
387
CO₂ Emissions
395
3,000
Annual Fuel Cost
2,600
Subcompact Cars
Vehicle Class
Standard Pickup Trucks 2WD
Similar Comparisons to Audi RS 3 vs Ford Ranger 2WD
More comparisons with Audi RS 3
More comparisons with Ford Ranger 2WD
Data sourced from EPA Fuel Economy Data (Public Domain (U.S. Government)).